Sonntag, 6. November 2011

prust gacker kreisch

[16:44:09] Tolomani > /emote wünscht sich n hartwick 2.0

ab und an ist es echt schwierig im chat nur zu gucken und die klappe zu halten

Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2011

ROFL

So much for propper development and engineering.

CCP send at the same address (actually the second time) where the evil, hatefull absolutly disgusting Brummel1 is behind, an invitation to rejoin EVE (for the expence of 4,95$)

I think there should someone really learn how to query SQL Databases.

Samstag, 22. Oktober 2011

Pixels

Well ... someone just asked me:

Why are you so upset ... thats just some pixels on the screen you saw.

Well here is my question:

Why are you so upset ... I am just wiping out some pixels on the screen!

Donnerstag, 20. Oktober 2011

Kommentarlos

http://www.buffed.de/Eve-Online-PC-69560/News/Eve-Online-Entwicklerstudio-CCP-Games-entlaesst-etwa-jeden-fuenften-Angestellten-850523/

Reminder

Just a reminder ... if you dont agree with the transfer and selling of your personal data and CCP is closing your account because you dont give your concent ... CCP has to refund your pre-paid game-fees.

If CCP dont refund you its theft and fraud, because its not your fault that CCP was acting outside the law when you first started and paid the account.

CCP and CSM

Here is another funny side aspect ...

Since I started I forwarded every Post to the mail-addresses of the CSM

Recently CCP has shut down the mail acess to the CSM ... the question is WHY?

Mittwoch, 19. Oktober 2011

CCP and laws

Well I am very quiet for some time ... to be precise ... since CCP started to spreat very nasty rumors about me ... for example ... I would molest children. This is a kind of dealing on wich I can only be silent otherwise I would lower my niveau to CCP-Level.

But now there is some new turning. The Icalandic Data Protection Agency investigated against CCP and found out CCP is violating every law by transfering personal datas about their customers totally unprotected around the world ... and specially without proper consent ... and no just a notice within the EULA isnt a proper consent according to Icelandic law.

Well CCP has till the 1st of December to get proper conset of every customer ... so watch out if there is some EULA-Changes and hidden within a notice about data transfer ... I could imagine CCP's way of abusing customers will lead to some new trick to hide that fact that customers have rights.

Montag, 22. August 2011

CCP seems to be well-known

Just had a really intersting chat in Gayromeo (largest Internet-Gay-Community in Europe and Worldwide)

Sum up : CCP? Dont bother with those homophobic bastards ... had my own experiences with them

It seems that I am not the only one having problems with CCP being openly gay ...

Donnerstag, 4. August 2011

Porn

Somebody just made a very good statement

according to the rules of CCP this would be also porn:

Sandro Botticelli - Die Geburt der Venus (Auch die Schaumgeborene oder La nascita de Venere)


Or maybe not because a GM can have a wank to it like happend in the past? So the question is ... when is a drawing from an known artist porn? When it doesnt fit into the view of the world ot the observing person? Well we do not want to consider employees and CEO's of a world-wide acting company to be philistine

Mittwoch, 3. August 2011

Celebration

WOW

since I adjusted the counter of this blog to count only new arrivals whe are getting to hit the 12.000th new visitor and reader of my blog

I think its amazing for something thats so specific to only one subject

Sonntag, 31. Juli 2011

It seems to have an impact

Today I realized that my Blog and my efford seems to have an impact.

Right now several people tryed to start a campain against me accusing me that I molested a 15 year old.

The "evidence" they use is some chating when a bunsh of people told the story of their first time ... :-D ... and now comes the funny part ... the story about my first time is the "proof" that I molested a teenager. If this theory is true than I must have had a hell of a wank that day.

Seems that somebody that only uses google translater because they cant afford a real translater is spreading rumors

I will not post any chat-logs in here because than once again there will be the accusition (like happend in the past) I forged them ... there are plenty possibilities out there to get the chat-logs ... ask the people spreading the rumor about the chat-logs, I am SURE they can provide you with it.

Interesting fact is again ... someone is getting realy desperate.

EDIT: I also thought ... what a huge homophobia must be within CCP ... they destroy their reputition gladly with open eyes instead of bringing themself to admit that they did something wrong and apologize

Samstag, 30. Juli 2011

First conclusions

 First conclusions how CCP differs between heterosexual and homosexual players ... let me point out one incident:

GM Syndemic
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi there,

What exactly is the issue here? The link you supplied is merely a girl with a gun.

Sincerely,
GM Syndemic
EVE Online Customer Support

I am sure what Gm Syndemic realy wanted to say was: "Where is the problem here, had a good wank fancying mounting this girl from behind"

Complaint Nr 9

Hi Guys,

well didnt felt well the past days ... this whole matter is getting to me and caused at least on TIA ... but I wont let this go because I didnt started the fight.

In the beginning I just wanted an apology and my account reopened ... but CCP decided to start a mud fight.

The funny thing is ... SeniorGM Huggin allready knew that noone at CCP is realy up to this and he/she/it allready knew that I wont let go so he/she/it offered me to transfer everything to my old account and reopen this instead of brummel. The question is ... if I am realy such a bad boy why reopening an old account.

Well lets go to the Complaint Nr. 9

Mr. Larusson from LOGOS Legal Services in London is refering a private mail I send. Also he compines it with a warning for repeating a GM's communication.

Thats astounding because in this private mail he states I never repated any GM communication ... so where is the fault in this?

Could it be that LOGOS in the attempt to make something up is again forgeing stuff? Or could it be that the members of CCP and LOGOS just unbeliebable incompetent?

EDIT: Since I couldnt reach the receiver of this mail in time I will not post the content of this mail in here but interested persons can mail me directly

Montag, 18. Juli 2011

CCP is getting realy pissed

CCP and LOGOS is getting realy pissed about the fact that I proofed them wrong ... do they realy think everyone other is stupid? Well I kept my log-files and saved my conversation with CCP ... luckily I did so it was sooo easy to identify the letter from LOGOS and CCP as intentional fake.

But here is how CCP reacted after i caught them and also my reaction to it (for better reading you can click on the scanned letter):


Here is my reation to it:


Dear Sir or Madam,

regarding the letter from 14.07.2011 I have to admit, CCP is playing the same games with you than they did with me. I also take the liberty to publish this answer (without any personal informations other than my own)

Since Mr. Larusson from LOGOS Legal Services took the liberty to forge informations, or at least process forged informations unchecked, I also take the liberty to forward this message to the English Law society for further steps.

Regarding Point 1.1

Mr. Larusson and CCP only gave partions of Informations. I allready proofed them, with the logs and datas and emails I safed on my own Computer, that Mr. Larusson and CCP only gave away informations of a kind, that may proof that CCP is all good and I am all evil.

Mr. Larusson for example totaly forgot to insert the complete communication between me and the customer support regarding the temporary ban 2010-02-14. I can not see what reason, beside hiding the fact that the picture he is trying to paint is totaly wrong, he had to leave this conversation out because it only is about me.

This conversation was very long and in the end the support of CCP had to admit that they reacted wrong. In the final statement the employee called "SeniorGM Huggin" stated that there was an investigation about that fact and there where several other employees involved. I bet they only communicated and took there notes on little tiny sheets of scrap-paper. Those informations also missing.

During my time at EVE Online as customer of CCP there where several incidents where other player harrased me ... funnily those petitions wherent also stated in the letter and at least there should be a info about what I petitioned and how the support reacted.

For example there where this incident where a player approached me several times with lines according to the Third Reich in the way "gays should be a victim for mercy killing" also he called me several times a "fag". Those petitions and also the statement of the support of CCP that they dont see any violation of the EULA isnt part of the letter from LOGOS Legal Services.

Furthermore Mr. Larusson states in his letter incidents and so-called "violations" that never happend ... so Mr. Larusson and CCP should review there datas because I can proof that at least two facts in the letter from LOGOS Legal services are wrong.

Intersting is also that two facts in this letter from LOGOS where private communications ... so clearly CCP intercepts and stores and reads private communications between players.

Also I took the liberty to publish this letter because the intention behind this letter was obvious ... only revealing informations about my "evilness" and also making up some more "violations" to justify themself. I will not take this anymore and will publish further. Since this publication is open I also only reveal informations about myself every bit and part regarding another person (beside CCP or LOGOS) is hidden. 

Here is the proof ... Mr. Larusson forgot this for example COMPLETLY in his letter and again it is only about me so I dont see where this is violating privacy rights of an other person since this other person involved in this statement is this anonymous Mr. Huggin acting as an official of CCP:

2010.02.15 15:50:00  GM Huginn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hallo brummel1,

Ich habe mir nochmal genau und ausführlich die gesamte Petitionsgeschichte hinter den Vorfällen, Warnungen und temporären Account-Bans durchgesehen, inklusive des Bildmaterials und Ihren Bemerkungen im German Chat Channel. Außerdem habe Ich Ihren Fall mit meinen Kollegen diskutiert und wir sind zu folgendem Schlußsatz gekommen:

Ich kann nur eine der Warnungen gutheißen, in der Sie wegen Hinweis auf folgenden Link, "http://kristoferwestonxxx.com/images/kristofer/09june/mud3.jpg" im German Chat Channel von einem Mitspieler gemeldet wurden. Dieses Bild gab ein allzu feindliches und herabwürdigendes Bild des Mannes als eines bloßen Sex-Objekts wieder.

Andere Warnungen sowie das Spielverbot Ihres Accounts, werden zurückgezogen. Ferner werde Ich Ihnen die verlorene Spielzeit aufgrund des Verbotes entweder auf Ihren Account, Benutzername: lbear oder aber einen beliebigen Ihrer Accounts gutschreiben.

Was die Vorgehensweise meiner Kollegen betrifft, sowie die wiederholten Warnungen, Gags und sonstige von ihnen getroffenen Maßnahmen, so haben wir dies genaustens untersucht und festgestellt, daß sie durchaus tadelnswert ist.  Ich möchte Ihnen hiermit versichern, daß die betreffenden Game Masters für ihre übertriebene Reaktion gegen sonstige, Ihrer vermeintlichen "Verstöße" gegen unsere Regeln, die Ihnen von Mitspielern angekreidet wurden, gerügt.

Und, Ich möchte Ihnen außerdem versichern, daß wir insofern wie möglich vermeiden werden, daß sich solche Vorfälle, wie in Ihrem Fall zutage traten, wiederholen werden. Ich bitte Sie vonseiten EVE Online um Entschuldigung für die Unannehmlichkeiten, die Ihnen hierdurch bereitet wurden.  Bitte, schreiben Sie mir bei Gelegenheit eine Antwort hierzu, um auf obiges bzw. die Sache im allgemeinen zu kommentieren.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Senior GM Huginn
Der EVE Online Kundendienst

But again since I am now dealing with a punsh of kindergarten bullies for over 8 month now, playing sorehead, I will not take this little game CCP is playing any longer and will publish there reactions as long as it only contains informations about myself

Besides ... this passage "no fruther request from BK will be answered" ... could be the joke of the year, because CCP and LOGOS never answered to any request, they only reacted under the preasure of the DPA and even than incomplete and only in a way that suits them.

Regarding Point 1.2

I remeber my own registration process very well ... at this point the EULA and the TOS wherent available in an other language than english. Besides I couldnt find any passage within the EULA that states CLEARLY that informations where send on a journey around the world.

Also even today never ever at any point at the registering process is ever asked for the permission to transfer the data within or outside the EEA


Finaly I have to say, CCP is playing the DPA in the same way they played me in the past. Only giving in in things they have to and only under preasure and even in this only reacting partly and unwillingly.

Best Regards

Donnerstag, 14. Juli 2011

Why - Part 2

Again ... with the yesterdays post I mailed the link to several game magazines and other persons who might be interested in this ... and again I received several mails with the question "Why are you doing this, you are destroying the reputation of CCP"

Well ... as an explanation ... when the ban first occured I was just interested in getting my account back and have some compensation for the time and afford. Over time this changed ... with CCP akting like "We are big bad-asses and you have no say" I thought ... okay ... if you might think so, lets see how bad-ass you are.

And it became like a horrible traffic-accident ... you are disgusted by it but you cant help to watch it ... the same case with CCP, with every step the "explanations" and "reactions" became more desperate and also became more embarrasing for CCP than the step before ... and like the traffic accident ... you cant stop ... you have to see to wich level CCP will destroy there own reputation. Again I only stated the facts ... if CCP embarressed themself its not my problem.

Also I think, since there are several cases like mine I decided that its good to have a view onto CCP apart from the manufactured glorifying comments in the different forums.

Mittwoch, 13. Juli 2011

Complaint Nr 8

For this complaint I took my time to gather and review all informations ... so I hope all readers will excuse the long time it took me to write this:

LOGOS Legal services wrote:

2010.02.05 09:59:00 BK sends the following e-mail in response to being temporarily blocked from EVE Online:

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

leider haben Sie es vermieden bezüglich der ungerechtfertigten Leistungsverweigerung [id-nummer] auf mein Angebot einer gütlichen Einigung wenigstens ansatzweise zu reagieren.

.
.
.

Well the letter was much longer but again ... its important to know ... the ban started on the 2010.02.04 and CCP was violating his own EULA by not reacting to any petition on this matter. Funnily again this specific matter seem to be vanished from the server logs.

But I can understand why Mr. Larusson and Mr. Petursson are so upset about this letter ... A customer has the audicity to question a decission? A customer has the impertinence to remind CCP on legal customer rights and rights coming from the EULA? ... THATS OFFENDING!!!

This gives us an interesting view on how CCP is seeing the customer-company-relationship and what CCP is thinking about customers at all.

After several days puting the screws on CCP I finally managed to get a SeniorGM looking into the ban. Again this is something that LOGOS and CCP failed to mention ... if this fact was deleted unintenionally from the server logs it reveals a serious malfunctioning in the serverlogs at all, so the typical Gm-response "our sever logs showed nothing" becomes a totaly new meaning.

TIP: After revealing this serious malfunction in the server logs a player should keep his own log files and several screen shots. Its helping to show the support where the serverlogs again failed to record something.

Well after looking into the case SeniorGM Huggin had to admit that there was no case ... beside one warning everything else was bogus and lifted the ban ... gave me several days of free time and deleted the entries in the player profile (and here again ... suddenly the entries are here again which also reveals a very extreme malfunction in the deletion routine)

Also interesting is that SeniorGM Huggin stated that several behaviours of fellow GM's where unjustified and blameable ... funnily exact the same behavior is going on the in future ... but we will come to that point very soon.


2010.02.15 15:50:00  GM Huginn
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hallo brummel1,

Ich habe mir nochmal genau und ausführlich die gesamte Petitionsgeschichte hinter den Vorfällen, Warnungen und temporären Account-Bans durchgesehen, inklusive des Bildmaterials und Ihren Bemerkungen im German Chat Channel. Außerdem habe Ich Ihren Fall mit meinen Kollegen diskutiert und wir sind zu folgendem Schlußsatz gekommen:

Ich kann nur eine der Warnungen gutheißen, in der Sie wegen Hinweis auf folgenden Link, "http://kristoferwestonxxx.com/images/kristofer/09june/mud3.jpg" im German Chat Channel von einem Mitspieler gemeldet wurden. Dieses Bild gab ein allzu feindliches und herabwürdigendes Bild des Mannes als eines bloßen Sex-Objekts wieder.

Andere Warnungen sowie das Spielverbot Ihres Accounts, werden zurückgezogen. Ferner werde Ich Ihnen die verlorene Spielzeit aufgrund des Verbotes entweder auf Ihren Account, Benutzername: lbear oder aber einen beliebigen Ihrer Accounts gutschreiben.

Was die Vorgehensweise meiner Kollegen betrifft, sowie die wiederholten Warnungen, Gags und sonstige von ihnen getroffenen Maßnahmen, so haben wir dies genaustens untersucht und festgestellt, daß sie durchaus tadelnswert ist.  Ich möchte Ihnen hiermit versichern, daß die betreffenden Game Masters für ihre übertriebene Reaktion gegen sonstige, Ihrer vermeintlichen "Verstöße" gegen unsere Regeln, die Ihnen von Mitspielern angekreidet wurden, gerügt.

Und, Ich möchte Ihnen außerdem versichern, daß wir insofern wie möglich vermeiden werden, daß sich solche Vorfälle, wie in Ihrem Fall zutage traten, wiederholen werden. Ich bitte Sie vonseiten EVE Online um Entschuldigung für die Unannehmlichkeiten, die Ihnen hierdurch bereitet wurden.  Bitte, schreiben Sie mir bei Gelegenheit eine Antwort hierzu, um auf obiges bzw. die Sache im allgemeinen zu kommentieren.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Senior GM Huginn
Der EVE Online Kundendienst

Montag, 11. Juli 2011

Why?

Since I forward every new post to game magazines I received a question from them, why am I doing this ... I think the answer is also enlightening for the rest of my readers:

Dear Sir or Madam,

one of your colleges asked me in a personal message, why am I doing this? Is my intention to ruin CCP?


well if I want to ruin CCP, I could do this much faster than publishing this stuff for over 7 month. I would go to an prosecutor in Germany or Iceland and CCP would have more trouble than I can ever give them BECAUSE (and thats my intention with this) Customers have rights, but since CCP is playing bully from the beginning I had no choice but going public with this and involve official authorities.

Not matter how hard CCP is trying to deny that and no matter how much CCP is "owning" EVE ... A paying Customer has rights ... along the way several official authorities allready proof me right with this. For example this letter I am right now discussing where written under the preasure of the icelandic data protection agency (and still CCP is trying to outrun this by only partly give away informations and forgeing informations)

CCP is claiming that they are owner of every bit of data in their server but this isnt true and this statement at all is illegal, because according to icelandic law and according to international contracts nobody can get ownership on personal datas. Personal datas allways remain in the ownership of the person itself no matter how hard they are trying to outrun this with EULA and TOS paragraphs. In this point for example allready set the icelandic data protection agency clear that CCP is violating icelandic law.

Let me give you an example ... if there would be a paragraph in the EULA that states that CCP has the right to format and destroy your harddrive whenever they want ... well no matter how often you aproof this paragraph it would still be illegal. Well the EULA consists of many illegal paragraphs and since there is no salvatorious clause the EULA at all is void (as a side-remark).

My intention at all is to show other players ... specially players which had or have problems themself ... to show that for example the EULA and TOS is illegal and void. I want to show them that no matter how hard CCP is trying to threat them, that there are ways to get there case going. I also want to show that some employees of CCP never understood in the past and will never understand in the future that customers are persons with rights and not beggars. (This case where allready VERY obvious within the Incarna distaster and the way CCP Hilmar and CCP Zulu at first "addressed" the community)

Regards

Sonntag, 10. Juli 2011

Commplaint Nr 7

The letter from CCP lawyers says

2010.02.04 BK posts, inter alia, the follwoing comment:

[2010.01.24 00:25:37] brummel1> /emote findet er sollte diese nette atmosphäre fördern und alle zum kuscheln animieren: http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd261/stardriver/gay/hard%20cuir%20bears/ShowingSomeLove.jpg

What mentioned before in the letter ... this comment was totaly inappropriate and offending ... and it was made at this day and lead to a petition

Funny thing because as we see from the time stamp that this comment was made 12 days before that ... 1) a petition because offense laying there for 12 days and no Gamemaster noticed it? 2)  This comment was made at this day (so Mr Larusson says) but the timestamp is from 12 days in the past ... the hell is the Server clock out of line 3)This is the translation of the post:
brummel1 thinks he should promote this friendly enviroment and should animate everyone to hugg
I looked up the chat-log at this specific day ... there where a very tense and angry discussion going on. So trying to get the tense and anger out of the chat is inappropriate and offending and totaly evil ... I get it.

Also here the picture ... but beware its so offending and inappropriate I even cant stand it myself ^^

From facts to fiction

Well you may noticed that the post didnt come as fast as before ... thats because now the letter I received from LOGOS and CCP are getting in the desperate need to justify themself from facts to fiction and its some work to sort that out

But be asure the CCP-Horror-Picture-Show will continue ... specially there is some nice material proofing that the "holly" Server-Logs are totally bogus and that CCP intercepts private conversations.